Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $140.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-13400F - $0.37 vs $2.35 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-11600 - 383 vs 375 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
375
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
16%
Price, $
$899.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |