In Atomfall, the Core i7-4960HQ is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4960HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4960HQ
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4960HQ Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1151 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
