In Atomfall, the Core i7-4820K is slower than the Core i5-12600KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $30 more expensive!
Core i7-4820K
No clear advantages
Core i5-12600KF
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 235 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 15% cheaper – $169.99 vs $199.88
- Up to 15% cheaper
- Up to 30% better value in Atomfall – $0.72 vs $1.03/FPS
- Up to 30% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-12600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
194 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
82%
Price, $
$199.88
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
70%
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
235 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
176 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-12600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-12600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $264.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
