In Atomfall, the Core i7-4820K is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $99 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 33% cheaper – $199.88 vs $298.98
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall – $1.04 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
192 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
77%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
66%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
87%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
