In Atomfall, the Core i7-4790T is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Core i7-4790T
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 34% cheaper – $98.95 vs $149.88
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall – $0.54 vs $0.73/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4790T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
74%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
183 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
90%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4790T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4790T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4790T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
