In Atomfall, the Core i3-330M is slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $50 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 34% cheaper – $98.95 vs $149.35
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall – $0.54 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
182 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
79%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
83%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
