In Deathloop, the Core i7-4770 is same performance as the Core i3-7100T. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $174 more expensive!
Core i7-4770
No clear advantages
Core i3-7100T
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 87% cheaper – $25.00 vs $198.95
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in Deathloop – $0.11 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4770 vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.95
12%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
12%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770 vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770 vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4770 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $312.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
