In Deathloop, the Core i3-7100T is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $169 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 87% cheaper – $25.00 vs $194.00
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in Deathloop – $0.11 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop – 246 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
89%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
12%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
