The Core i7-4765T is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $320.93 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4765T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Up to 64% cheaper – $178.02 vs $498.95
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
133
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, $
$498.95
35%
Value, $/FPS
$3.75/FPS
38%
Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4765T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
