Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3404 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Core i7-4765T
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $498.95 vs $499.88
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 22% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4765T - 195 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4765T - $2.56 vs $3.12 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 32 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.88
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $499.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4765T | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |