In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4765T is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4765T
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
183 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
89%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
