The Core i7-4765T is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-7300 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $300.71 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-7300
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 84% cheaper – $56.38 vs $357.09
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-7300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
176
95%
Min 1% FPS
118
96%
Price, $
$357.09
15%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
15%
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$56.38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-7300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-7300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-7300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4765T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
