The Core i7-4765T is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Athlon 3000G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $297.06 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4765T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 3000G
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 83% cheaper – $60.03 vs $357.09
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-4765T vs Athlon 3000G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
176
99%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, $
$357.09
16%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
16%
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, $
$60.03
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Core i7-4765T vs Athlon 3000G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Athlon 3000G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Athlon 3000G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4765T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
$303.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |