In Atomfall, the Core i7-3970X is slower than the Core i7-14650HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3970X
No clear advantages
Core i7-14650HX
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Nov 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 55 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3970X vs Core i7-14650HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
81%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3970X vs Core i7-14650HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3970X vs Core i7-14650HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
15 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-14650HX
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3970X Nov 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14650HX Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $990.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
