In Atomfall, the Core i7-3970X is slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $78 more expensive!
Core i7-3970X
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Nov 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 45% cheaper – $96.99 vs $175.00
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Atomfall – $0.42 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 58 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3970X vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
84%
Price, $
$175
55%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
47%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3970X vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3970X vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3970X Nov 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $990.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
