In Atomfall, the Core i7-3930K is slightly slower than the Core i3-7100T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3930K
No clear advantages
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 201 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Nov 14, 2011
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3930K vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3930K vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3930K vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3930K Nov 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 14th, 2011 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $583.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
