In Atomfall, the Core i3-7100T is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $544 cheaper!
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 96% cheaper – $25.00 vs $569.00
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 94% better value in Atomfall – $0.12 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 94% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 266 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 3 days newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 3 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
201 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
76%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
266 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
199 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
4%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
6%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
