In Deathloop, the Core i7-3820QM is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820QM vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820QM vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820QM vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
71%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820QM Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
