In Deathloop, the Core i9-10900F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
71%
L3 Cache
20 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
46%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
