In Atomfall, the Core i7-3770K is slower than the Core i9-13900KS. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $620 cheaper!
Core i7-3770K
- Up to 82% cheaper – $132.19 vs $751.89
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $3.03/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 77 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 49% less energy
Core i9-13900KS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 12, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3770K vs Core i9-13900KS: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
78%
Price, $
$132.19
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$751.89
17%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770K vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770K vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KS Jan 12th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 12th, 2023 |
$313.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
