In Atomfall, the Core i7-3770K is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Core i7-3770K
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $149.35 vs $169.61
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $0.87/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 60 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3770K vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
85%
Price, $
$169.61
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
75%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770K vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770K vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $313.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
