In Atomfall, the Core i7-3687U is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3687U
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 1 day newer – Jan 08, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i3-330M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3687U vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
184 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
97%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3687U vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3687U vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3687U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3687U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGAG1 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
