Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2675QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-2675QM - 131 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2675QM | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |