In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-2600K is slightly slower than the Core i5-650 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $187 more expensive!
Core i7-2600K
- Is 1 year and 1 day newer – Jan 09, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 1 day newer
Core i5-650
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 75% cheaper – $63.33 vs $249.95
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.31 vs $1.30/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600K vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
192 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
94%
Price, $
$249.95
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
24%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $317.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
