In Dead Space, the Core i7-2600K is same performance as the Core i5-650. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $7 more expensive!
Core i7-2600K
- Is 1 year and 1 day newer – Jan 09, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 1 day newer
Core i5-650
- Up to 9% cheaper – $67.59 vs $74.25
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Dead Space – $0.38 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Dead Space
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600K vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
174 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.25
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
90%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
174 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
100%
Price, $
$67.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $317.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
