Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 and the cheaper Core i7-14700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $273.18 vs $574.75
- Up to 51% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900 - $0.49 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 4% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700F - 583 vs 558 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7196 minutes ago
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |