Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $76.80 vs $574.75
- Up to 85% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900 - $0.52 vs $3.55 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-12100F - 162 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
58 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |