Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 25% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-10700F - 270 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $207.95 vs $310.00
- Up to 17% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-13700K - $0.96 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $310 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2728 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$207.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $207.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2728 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700K | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |