Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $207.95 vs $343.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 5950X - $1.68 vs $2.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - 130 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$207.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $207.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6477 minutes ago
Buy for $343.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6477 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |