Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $224.00 vs $332.61
- Up to 20% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-14700K - $0.91 vs $1.14 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-10700F - 292 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 28 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$224
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
292
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
80%
Price, $
$332.61
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $332.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |