In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-13700 is slightly slower than the FX-9590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $88 more expensive!
Core i7-13700
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 65 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
FX-9590
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 24% cheaper – $282.02 vs $369.99
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 34% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.43 vs $2.18/FPS
- Up to 34% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700 vs FX-9590: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$369.99
76%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
66%
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$282.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700 vs FX-9590 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700 vs FX-9590 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| $384.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM3+ |
65 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
