In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-9590 is faster than the Ryzen 5 7600X. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $105 more expensive!
FX-9590
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 37% cheaper – $177.00 vs $282.02
- Up to 37% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.04 vs $1.43/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 105 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$282.02
62%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
73%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
169 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9590 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9590 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
94%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
