Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-10105F - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $76.22 vs $235.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-12700F - $0.40 vs $1.22 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
33%
Price, $
$235.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 422 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
190
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $76.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 422 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |