In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-10700K is slightly slower than the FX-9590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $99 more expensive!
Core i7-10700K
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 125 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
FX-9590
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 26% cheaper – $282.02 vs $380.99
- Up to 26% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.45 vs $2.22/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700K vs FX-9590: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
88%
Price, $
$380.99
74%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
65%
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
194 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$282.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700K vs FX-9590 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700K vs FX-9590 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM3+ |
125 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
