Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Core i7-10700K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $304.99 vs $405.00
- Up to 21% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i9-13900F - $1.00 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i7-10700K - 319 vs 304 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 32 vs 16 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
304
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$304.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1149 minutes ago
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1148 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700K | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |