The Core i5-9400F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G630, however, it's the same value for money, as it's $74.26 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-9400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G630
- Up to 71% cheaper – $30.74 vs $105.00
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i5-9400F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i5-9400F vs Pentium G630 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$105
29%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
32%
Pentium G630
Sep 4th, 2011
Average FPS
166
89%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, $
$30.74
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F vs Pentium G630 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Pentium G630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Pentium G630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Pentium G630
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-9400F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
9 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |