The Core i5-9400F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $2.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-9400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 3% cheaper – $102.02 vs $105.00
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i5-9400F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i5-9400F vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$105
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-9400F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Not Available | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
9 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |