In Elden Ring, the Core i5-760 is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a better value for money, as it's $42 cheaper!
Core i5-760
- Up to 4% faster in Elden Ring – 141 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Elden Ring
- Up to 35% cheaper – $77.66 vs $119.99
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Elden Ring – $0.55 vs $0.88/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Elden Ring
Core i5-9400F
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jul 18, 2010
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Core i5-760 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
141 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
98%
Price, $
$77.66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
136 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
62%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-760 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-760 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-760 Jul 18th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
