In Dead Space, the Core i5-760 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $53 cheaper!
Core i5-760
- Up to 44% cheaper – $66.65 vs $119.99
- Up to 44% cheaper
- Up to 44% better value in Dead Space – $0.38 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 44% better value in Dead Space
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 176 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jul 18, 2010
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i5-760 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
98%
Price, $
$66.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
176 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
55%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
56%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-760 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-760 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-760 Jul 18th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
