In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i5-7600. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $14 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 182 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-7600
- Up to 17% cheaper – $64.52 vs $78.02
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 14% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.36 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
86%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
176 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
97%
Price, $
$64.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
