In Atomfall, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-7600 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $3 more expensive!
Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-7600
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 4% cheaper – $75.05 vs $78.02
- Up to 4% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $0.39/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
200 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
97%
Price, $
$78.02
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
92%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$75.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
