In Rust, the Core i5-7400T is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M and it's also a better value for money, as it's $21 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 216 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 21% cheaper – $78.02 vs $98.95
- Up to 21% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Rust – $0.36 vs $0.47/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Rust
Core i3-330M
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
39 FPS
83%
Price, $
$98.95
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
77%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
