In Mass Effect: Andromeda, the Core i5-7400T is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $21 cheaper!
Core i5-7400T
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 21% cheaper – $78.02 vs $98.95
- Up to 21% cheaper
- Up to 20% better value in Mass Effect: Andromeda – $0.08 vs $0.10/FPS
- Up to 20% better value in Mass Effect: Andromeda
Core i3-330M
- Up to 1% faster in Mass Effect: Andromeda – 951 vs 942 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Mass Effect: Andromeda
Mass Effect: Andromeda FPS Calculator
Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
942 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
522 FPS
98%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
951 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
533 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
80%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
