The Core i5-6400 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10920X, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $750.28 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
- Up to 94% cheaper – $46.97 vs $797.25
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-10920X
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
Core i5-6400 vs Core i9-10920X
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
195
95%
Min 1% FPS
134
95%
Price, $
$46.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, $
$797.25
5%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
6%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6400 vs Core i9-10920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6400 vs Core i9-10920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
$182.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Skylake | Codename | Cascade Lake-X |
65 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 19.25 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |