Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Core i5-6400
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $56.68 vs $90.09
- Up to 28% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-14100F - $0.48 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6400 - 134 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
118
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1465 minutes ago
Buy for $90.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1463 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6400 | vs | Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |