The Core i5-6400 is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G and it's also a better value for money, as it's $13.33 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 18% cheaper – $61.60 vs $74.93
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
The Core i5-6400 is better in every way
Core i5-6400 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
$61.6
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
99%
Min 1% FPS
119
99%
Price, $
$74.93
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
83%
Core i5-6400 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6400 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6400 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
