The Core i5-5675C is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $7.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-5675C
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 9% cheaper – $82.02 vs $90.00
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i5-5675C vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-5675C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$90
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Core i5-5675C vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5675C vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5675C vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5675C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-5675C | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$276.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |