The Core i5-4690K is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $11.88 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-4690K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 88 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 13% cheaper – $82.02 vs $93.90
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i5-4690K vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, $
$93.9
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
96%
Core i5-4690K vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4690K vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4690K vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4690K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $243.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
88 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
