In Atomfall, the Core i5-4590 is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $33 more expensive!
Core i5-4590
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 203 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 25% cheaper – $98.95 vs $132.02
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in Atomfall – $0.53 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4590 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4590
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
203 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$132.02
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
82%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
184 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
91%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4590 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
