The Core i5-3427U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 17 vs 105 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 5950X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i5-3427U vs Ryzen 9 5950X
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3427U
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
182
83%
Min 1% FPS
126
84%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
220
100%
Min 1% FPS
150
100%
Price, $
$291.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3427U vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3427U vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3427U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
57%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-3427U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
17 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
